<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear of the blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Well that is some wicked shit! Palgrave and Sage, awesome! When are you going to send out chapters for far off mates to have a look-see, aye? 



RA rock stars and da loser playing the guitaree.



Advance! Advance! Yes please, except for the mild Enlightenment-Project ring to it, haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that is some wicked shit! Palgrave and Sage, awesome! When are you going to send out chapters for far off mates to have a look-see, aye? </p>
<p>RA rock stars and da loser playing the guitaree.</p>
<p>Advance! Advance! Yes please, except for the mild Enlightenment-Project ring to it, haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-206</guid>
		<description>what am i trying to say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what am i trying to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-207</guid>
		<description>What the?!?! Hmmmm...

[No joke first line]



Just another example of me giving a trick answer to a question which wasn't a trick question and the question in question was in fact one which no one asked. 

[That was a joke. It was primarily derived from something my high school chemistry teacher said to me once (about the trick answers/questions, I failed chem, haha) combined with the joke about philosophers answering questions which no one had asked.]



Or maybe my jokes are just too lame.

[Above does not contain any jokes.]



Translation from Padwan-Blogger Glen-speak:

[Ditto.]



---- ---- ----



Welldone on the publication response (ie wicked shit!).



Joke (deleuze and guattari :: de loser and guitaree, connects with rockstar RA's, fashaw bro!).



Another joke (advancing 'humankind' to the lofty ideals of the Elightenment Project connects with the forward of cash-money from aforementioned publishers for the book you have mentioned and briefly written about on here and in emails sometimes).



---- ---- ----

[The above has been stripped of jokes, although it could contain some humour, so please be warned.]



Clear that one up!?!?! 

[Serious question, does not contain any jokes.]



I am perfectly jealous of course and my inbuilt suburban pseudo-wog/bogan masculinity refuses me the opportunity to articulate a simple compliment which is exactly what my seemingly random dumbass jokes and comments were obscuring. Certainly that is a cop out, as I am quite capable of self-reflexive thought, so I guess it also is a bit of heroine worship as you have managed to get your foot in the academic door, ala 'early career researcher' (or whatever the grant-thing was called from a blog post a few weeks ago). 

[No jokes in that paragraph.]



Though I was dead serious about having a read. I am just starting to build up the pressure now so eventually you will have to crack under the relentless blog-post pressure and give us a look (all cloak and dagger like, so the publishers are none the wiser, haha!). 

[That last bit was joke-ified by the way, it wasn't a joke, it was a serious comment *modified* with a joke.]



I need to use more emoticon winks and shit when I write messages, maybe use more zeds and numerics in place of the alphas, too, cause then I'll look blogger core. Maybe even start letting a bit of progamming language 'accidently' creep into my email and blog discourse so it looks like I was born with a tail thinking in ones and zeros. 

[That was a joke, and I am thinking of some of the posts to the fibre-culture list and some of the blog and forum posts I have read during my history as an internet user.]



Or maybe not. 

[A non-comic response to a joke.]



Writing in the face of my online communicative disabilities, let me try that again:

[Serious. I am trying.]

---- ---- ----



Excellent work Mel :). I feel proud to know someone who has successfully taken the next step after postgrad life into postdoc life. The book sounds very exciting (!!!) and I hope one day you will feel comfortable enough with your draft to let me have a read. ;)



Your comments about the rockstar research assistant thing reminds me that when I first started reading Deleuze and Guatari's work. I used to call them 'de loser and guitaree' (as in the loser and guitar);). I used to think that a romaticised Deleuze (check out the old Spoon's D&#038;G list, it was infested with nutter schizo-poets) is probably the closest thing to being an tragic academic/rock-god like the rock/metal gods such as Jim Morrison or Bon Scott who died before their time. lol



Lastly, the question from Sage Commissioning Editor about whether or not you would like an advance is quite funny if you think about it not being an advance of money, but an advance in the sense of the old Enlightenment tradition. Coming from a tradition (or maybe coming from a tradition that was influenced by another tradition, postmodernism) that was critical of the Enlightenment project it is highly ironic that some Germanic critical theorists (and now maybe even Badiou) would probably think of your book as an advance for scholarly human kind. lol!



I would make a good comic if my sense of humour wasn't so damned introverted and I was, in fact, funny. Hopefully you will forgive me for being a man of mirth and easily incited to giggles about these sort of inane nerd jokes.



Glen.



---- ---- ----

[Warning: Above contains some jokes, but hopefully I have written it clearly enough for the meaning of each paragraph to be clear.}



Yep. Dang I am up late! Bloody panel vans...

[Serious. No joke line.]



Glen.

[Serious, this is actually me.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the?!?! Hmmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>[No joke first line]</p>
<p>Just another example of me giving a trick answer to a question which wasn&#8217;t a trick question and the question in question was in fact one which no one asked. </p>
<p>[That was a joke. It was primarily derived from something my high school chemistry teacher said to me once (about the trick answers/questions, I failed chem, haha) combined with the joke about philosophers answering questions which no one had asked.]</p>
<p>Or maybe my jokes are just too lame.</p>
<p>[Above does not contain any jokes.]</p>
<p>Translation from Padwan-Blogger Glen-speak:</p>
<p>[Ditto.]</p>
<p>&#8212;- &#8212;- &#8212;-</p>
<p>Welldone on the publication response (ie wicked shit!).</p>
<p>Joke (deleuze and guattari :: de loser and guitaree, connects with rockstar RA&#8217;s, fashaw bro!).</p>
<p>Another joke (advancing &#8216;humankind&#8217; to the lofty ideals of the Elightenment Project connects with the forward of cash-money from aforementioned publishers for the book you have mentioned and briefly written about on here and in emails sometimes).</p>
<p>&#8212;- &#8212;- &#8212;-</p>
<p>[The above has been stripped of jokes, although it could contain some humour, so please be warned.]</p>
<p>Clear that one up!?!?! </p>
<p>[Serious question, does not contain any jokes.]</p>
<p>I am perfectly jealous of course and my inbuilt suburban pseudo-wog/bogan masculinity refuses me the opportunity to articulate a simple compliment which is exactly what my seemingly random dumbass jokes and comments were obscuring. Certainly that is a cop out, as I am quite capable of self-reflexive thought, so I guess it also is a bit of heroine worship as you have managed to get your foot in the academic door, ala &#8216;early career researcher&#8217; (or whatever the grant-thing was called from a blog post a few weeks ago). </p>
<p>[No jokes in that paragraph.]</p>
<p>Though I was dead serious about having a read. I am just starting to build up the pressure now so eventually you will have to crack under the relentless blog-post pressure and give us a look (all cloak and dagger like, so the publishers are none the wiser, haha!). </p>
<p>[That last bit was joke-ified by the way, it wasn't a joke, it was a serious comment *modified* with a joke.]</p>
<p>I need to use more emoticon winks and shit when I write messages, maybe use more zeds and numerics in place of the alphas, too, cause then I&#8217;ll look blogger core. Maybe even start letting a bit of progamming language &#8216;accidently&#8217; creep into my email and blog discourse so it looks like I was born with a tail thinking in ones and zeros. </p>
<p>[That was a joke, and I am thinking of some of the posts to the fibre-culture list and some of the blog and forum posts I have read during my history as an internet user.]</p>
<p>Or maybe not. </p>
<p>[A non-comic response to a joke.]</p>
<p>Writing in the face of my online communicative disabilities, let me try that again:</p>
<p>[Serious. I am trying.]</p>
<p>&#8212;- &#8212;- &#8212;-</p>
<p>Excellent work Mel :). I feel proud to know someone who has successfully taken the next step after postgrad life into postdoc life. The book sounds very exciting (!!!) and I hope one day you will feel comfortable enough with your draft to let me have a read. <img src='http://homecookedtheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Your comments about the rockstar research assistant thing reminds me that when I first started reading Deleuze and Guatari&#8217;s work. I used to call them &#8216;de loser and guitaree&#8217; (as in the loser and guitar);). I used to think that a romaticised Deleuze (check out the old Spoon&#8217;s D&#038;G list, it was infested with nutter schizo-poets) is probably the closest thing to being an tragic academic/rock-god like the rock/metal gods such as Jim Morrison or Bon Scott who died before their time. lol</p>
<p>Lastly, the question from Sage Commissioning Editor about whether or not you would like an advance is quite funny if you think about it not being an advance of money, but an advance in the sense of the old Enlightenment tradition. Coming from a tradition (or maybe coming from a tradition that was influenced by another tradition, postmodernism) that was critical of the Enlightenment project it is highly ironic that some Germanic critical theorists (and now maybe even Badiou) would probably think of your book as an advance for scholarly human kind. lol!</p>
<p>I would make a good comic if my sense of humour wasn&#8217;t so damned introverted and I was, in fact, funny. Hopefully you will forgive me for being a man of mirth and easily incited to giggles about these sort of inane nerd jokes.</p>
<p>Glen.</p>
<p>&#8212;- &#8212;- &#8212;-</p>
<p>[Warning: Above contains some jokes, but hopefully I have written it clearly enough for the meaning of each paragraph to be clear.}</p>
<p>Yep. Dang I am up late! Bloody panel vans...</p>
<p>[Serious. No joke line.]</p>
<p>Glen.</p>
<p>[Serious, this is actually me.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Well done! Soon I'll be able to say "I knew her before she was famous..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! Soon I&#8217;ll be able to say &#8220;I knew her before she was famous&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Thanks for plug. 



That wasn't card-onnay on the weekend at the picnic. I was drinking it out of a BOTTLE remember? Admittedly it was a sub-$10 bottle but hey, I sacrificed quite a sizable quantity for that step up in percieved quality. And it didn't mean a dang thing the next day when I missed the Christening of my friend's first born child because I was incapacitated. Pity me, I'm obviously a terrible person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for plug. </p>
<p>That wasn&#8217;t card-onnay on the weekend at the picnic. I was drinking it out of a BOTTLE remember? Admittedly it was a sub-$10 bottle but hey, I sacrificed quite a sizable quantity for that step up in percieved quality. And it didn&#8217;t mean a dang thing the next day when I missed the Christening of my friend&#8217;s first born child because I was incapacitated. Pity me, I&#8217;m obviously a terrible person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mc gregg</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>mc gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-210</guid>
		<description>oops, yes now i see the difference. thanks for the correction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, yes now i see the difference. thanks for the correction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian McCrea</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian McCrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Reticence is understood... but remember you can often shield yourself from anything by revealing everything. In any case, you're an excellent read at the moment.



Reading (and writing) Deleuze is the ultimate style of the Secret Conspiracy... the unfolding lysergic confidence, just let it amplify and see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reticence is understood&#8230; but remember you can often shield yourself from anything by revealing everything. In any case, you&#8217;re an excellent read at the moment.</p>
<p>Reading (and writing) Deleuze is the ultimate style of the Secret Conspiracy&#8230; the unfolding lysergic confidence, just let it amplify and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-212</guid>
		<description>way to go mc.  and glen, I'm pretty sure I made up the de loser and guitaree joke, in reference to my former belief that D&#038;G was a 1980s UK new wave pop duo that I'd missed out on at the time.  de loser and guitaree is way more metal than that of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way to go mc.  and glen, I&#8217;m pretty sure I made up the de loser and guitaree joke, in reference to my former belief that D&#038;G was a 1980s UK new wave pop duo that I&#8217;d missed out on at the time.  de loser and guitaree is way more metal than that of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2005/01/11/fear-of-the-blogosphere/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=110#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Mel! I hope this isn't a trend, you know, suddenly you've got all these book contracts to deal with and blogging doesn't pay the bills. There are a bunch of us out here relying on your insight :).



BTW, could you write something on Greer and Big Brother? Pretty please?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Mel! I hope this isn&#8217;t a trend, you know, suddenly you&#8217;ve got all these book contracts to deal with and blogging doesn&#8217;t pay the bills. There are a bunch of us out here relying on your insight :).</p>
<p>BTW, could you write something on Greer and Big Brother? Pretty please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
