<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More notes on cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: melgregg</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-47504</link>
		<dc:creator>melgregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/#comment-47504</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,
No worries! Glad you found it useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,<br />
No worries! Glad you found it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Gall</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-47496</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Gall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2006/09/13/more-notes-on-cool/#comment-47496</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post. I was not familiar with this book before reading about it here, but what you&#039;ve sketched in a really concise way is a set of reasons for reading it, even given my very different research interests (Australian studies, to put it in a disciplinary frame). Or, perhaps I should be reading the work that you&#039;re going to be producing over the next several years instead, since you seem to have taken it on in such a thorough fashion? At any rate, genuine thanks are in order for your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post. I was not familiar with this book before reading about it here, but what you&#8217;ve sketched in a really concise way is a set of reasons for reading it, even given my very different research interests (Australian studies, to put it in a disciplinary frame). Or, perhaps I should be reading the work that you&#8217;re going to be producing over the next several years instead, since you seem to have taken it on in such a thorough fashion? At any rate, genuine thanks are in order for your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

