Comments on: Online intimacy: On crushes and stalkers http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/ Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:19:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: seonaid http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-54683 seonaid Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:37:53 +0000 http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-54683 http://www.nerve.com/personalessays/traister/toomuchinformation/ tried to put in the comments for 'not dating' post - but couldn't ...more relevant there http://www.nerve.com/personalessays/traister/toomuchinformation/

tried to put in the comments for ‘not dating’ post - but couldn’t …more relevant there

]]> By: melgregg http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-50343 melgregg Sun, 28 Jan 2007 05:10:53 +0000 http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-50343 Thanks for the tip... Thanks for the tip…

]]> By: jean http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-50211 jean Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:22:24 +0000 http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2007/01/19/online-intimacy-on-crushes-and-stalkers/#comment-50211 hey mc, have you run across Deborah Chambers new book 'New Social Ties' (2006)? If so, any thoughts? She talks about a 'postmodern feminist ethics of care' incorporating a whole heap of stuff about individualism, friendship and intimacy (including online) as a counterpoint to Putnam et al's arguments about the decline of social capital. It's in a 'to read' pile on my desk, so that summary might be a bit off, but it's what I get from a quick skim. hey mc, have you run across Deborah Chambers new book ‘New Social Ties’ (2006)? If so, any thoughts? She talks about a ‘postmodern feminist ethics of care’ incorporating a whole heap of stuff about individualism, friendship and intimacy (including online) as a counterpoint to Putnam et al’s arguments about the decline of social capital. It’s in a ‘to read’ pile on my desk, so that summary might be a bit off, but it’s what I get from a quick skim.

]]>