<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The tenor of rejection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academic publishing, e-books and open access &#171; barrysaunders.com</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89383</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic publishing, e-books and open access &#171; barrysaunders.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89383</guid>
		<description>[...] Gregg has a great post up about the difficulties of publishing as an Australian academic interested in Australian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gregg has a great post up about the difficulties of publishing as an Australian academic interested in Australian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy hunsinger</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy hunsinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89232</guid>
		<description>There already are several open access peer reviewed academic publishing houses.  The problem there... is usually one of reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There already are several open access peer reviewed academic publishing houses.  The problem there&#8230; is usually one of reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89228</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89228</guid>
		<description>just out of curiosity, what is the benefit in publishing books? From what I understand no-one makes money out of it except the publisher - is it simply for career progression? If so, is it the quality of the publisher, whether it&#039;s peer reviewed...

I&#039;m just wondering because it seems like there&#039;s a space in here for an open-access, peer reviewed, academic e-book / on demand publishing house.... I know on demand publishing gets no respect, but surely a peer reviewed academic imprint would compensate for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just out of curiosity, what is the benefit in publishing books? From what I understand no-one makes money out of it except the publisher &#8211; is it simply for career progression? If so, is it the quality of the publisher, whether it&#8217;s peer reviewed&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering because it seems like there&#8217;s a space in here for an open-access, peer reviewed, academic e-book / on demand publishing house&#8230;. I know on demand publishing gets no respect, but surely a peer reviewed academic imprint would compensate for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy hunsinger</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy hunsinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89227</guid>
		<description>Did you try Kate Hayles and Mark Poster&#039;s Series, Steve Jones&#039; Series... there are a few other acquisition editors i might send you to, but rejections happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try Kate Hayles and Mark Poster&#8217;s Series, Steve Jones&#8217; Series&#8230; there are a few other acquisition editors i might send you to, but rejections happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89220</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 06:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89220</guid>
		<description>put it up on eprints - after a few days you&#039;ll get Indian textbook publishers wanting to publish it ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put it up on eprints &#8211; after a few days you&#8217;ll get Indian textbook publishers wanting to publish it ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glen</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89214</link>
		<dc:creator>glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 10:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89214</guid>
		<description>oh well

I have been working on my book proposal, too, since it got knocked back last year by a publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh well</p>
<p>I have been working on my book proposal, too, since it got knocked back last year by a publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89212</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89212</guid>
		<description>Grrr.  The fools.  The mad, mad fools.

Mind you, I&#039;m not at all surprised by the US-centric bias.  I&#039;m not happy about it, of course, but it&#039;s a bad trend that&#039;s been getting worse for a long time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrr.  The fools.  The mad, mad fools.</p>
<p>Mind you, I&#8217;m not at all surprised by the US-centric bias.  I&#8217;m not happy about it, of course, but it&#8217;s a bad trend that&#8217;s been getting worse for a long time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89211</guid>
		<description>At least they didn&#039;t tell you that online self-publishing is your only option... 

I got this one a couple of days ago:

&#039;Thank you for sending your proposal which I have now been able to look
through. I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;m going to have to say no; you&#039;re a good lively
writer and the story is interesting but the combination of the narrow focus
and the length means that I&#039;m not confident that we&#039;d find an audience for
this book... Perhaps its
home should be digital?&#039;

The crap thing is that I think they are probably right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least they didn&#8217;t tell you that online self-publishing is your only option&#8230; </p>
<p>I got this one a couple of days ago:</p>
<p>&#8216;Thank you for sending your proposal which I have now been able to look<br />
through. I&#8217;m afraid that I&#8217;m going to have to say no; you&#8217;re a good lively<br />
writer and the story is interesting but the combination of the narrow focus<br />
and the length means that I&#8217;m not confident that we&#8217;d find an audience for<br />
this book&#8230; Perhaps its<br />
home should be digital?&#8217;</p>
<p>The crap thing is that I think they are probably right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna Hickey-Moody</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/05/08/the-tenor-of-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-89210</link>
		<dc:creator>anna Hickey-Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=997#comment-89210</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t empathize enough. In January of this year an A ranked Australian journal told me if they were going to publish a special issue edited by myself and 2 other Aus E.C academics then we needed to include the work of at least 2 professors from the U.S or U.K. Then, when I made a case for &#039;Southern Voices and Storylines&#039; -- after R. Connell&#039;s work on Southern Theory, they told me my theoretical rationale was weak. But they accepted the issue once we had the international professors on board. How kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t empathize enough. In January of this year an A ranked Australian journal told me if they were going to publish a special issue edited by myself and 2 other Aus E.C academics then we needed to include the work of at least 2 professors from the U.S or U.K. Then, when I made a case for &#8216;Southern Voices and Storylines&#8217; &#8212; after R. Connell&#8217;s work on Southern Theory, they told me my theoretical rationale was weak. But they accepted the issue once we had the international professors on board. How kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

