<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suggested reading: online friends and intimacies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/06/16/suggested-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/06/16/suggested-reading/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: melgregg</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/06/16/suggested-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-89349</link>
		<dc:creator>melgregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=1024#comment-89349</guid>
		<description>Thanks both of you. Any advances/ similar sites to ElFriendo would be good to know about. 

But I think I&#039;m going to leave the media texts up to students to choose and explore, since I think using specific examples can be a bit risky. I&#039;m more interested in accessible conceptual writing that they might then use to think about their everyday media choices. Still thinking out loud for a few more days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks both of you. Any advances/ similar sites to ElFriendo would be good to know about. </p>
<p>But I think I&#8217;m going to leave the media texts up to students to choose and explore, since I think using specific examples can be a bit risky. I&#8217;m more interested in accessible conceptual writing that they might then use to think about their everyday media choices. Still thinking out loud for a few more days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel O</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/06/16/suggested-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-89346</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=1024#comment-89346</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a whole history of net.art and electronic fiction that theorises and performs networked intimacy - fluctuations of forms and thematics in accordance with changes in platforms. A simple one-to-one but evocative work that comes to mind is Two Solitudes. I can only find it here, where there is a link to a download of the whole piece combined (not ideal). http://interconnected.org/home/2009/02/18/carl_steadman_opened
Is there love in the telematic embrace? i.e. Roy Ascott and his aftermath? There is  also Susan Kozel, &#039;Closer&#039;, useful for thinking about the performance of online intimacy and embodiment by a &#039;trained&#039; performer, which I suggest because it&#039;s v. interesting writing to view outside of/beyond performance theory as a challenge to academic writing/thinking _about_ online intimacy and scholarly expertise. 
Also, check this out - a lighthearteded social networking spoof by the dynamo govcom group here in amsterdam - http://www.elfriendo.com/ Put together very quickly but great swift programming and capturing 2.0 malaise perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a whole history of net.art and electronic fiction that theorises and performs networked intimacy &#8211; fluctuations of forms and thematics in accordance with changes in platforms. A simple one-to-one but evocative work that comes to mind is Two Solitudes. I can only find it here, where there is a link to a download of the whole piece combined (not ideal). <a href="http://interconnected.org/home/2009/02/18/carl_steadman_opened" rel="nofollow">http://interconnected.org/home/2009/02/18/carl_steadman_opened</a><br />
Is there love in the telematic embrace? i.e. Roy Ascott and his aftermath? There is  also Susan Kozel, &#8216;Closer&#8217;, useful for thinking about the performance of online intimacy and embodiment by a &#8216;trained&#8217; performer, which I suggest because it&#8217;s v. interesting writing to view outside of/beyond performance theory as a challenge to academic writing/thinking _about_ online intimacy and scholarly expertise.<br />
Also, check this out &#8211; a lighthearteded social networking spoof by the dynamo govcom group here in amsterdam &#8211; <a href="http://www.elfriendo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.elfriendo.com/</a> Put together very quickly but great swift programming and capturing 2.0 malaise perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glen</title>
		<link>http://homecookedtheory.com/archives/2009/06/16/suggested-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-89341</link>
		<dc:creator>glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homecookedtheory.com/?p=1024#comment-89341</guid>
		<description>Babel? That is a great exploration of the complexity of intimacy in different contexts. It sets up a weird relationship between causality and intimacy.

And Punch-Drunk Love? The phone s3x line thing, lol! and Sandler&#039;s charcater&#039;s inability to be intimate. I may have written an essay about this *cough*

I am really interested in this stuff, as I guess most quasi-asbergers geeks are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babel? That is a great exploration of the complexity of intimacy in different contexts. It sets up a weird relationship between causality and intimacy.</p>
<p>And Punch-Drunk Love? The phone s3x line thing, lol! and Sandler&#8217;s charcater&#8217;s inability to be intimate. I may have written an essay about this *cough*</p>
<p>I am really interested in this stuff, as I guess most quasi-asbergers geeks are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

